Big-O Software

Timelessblur wrote:That just seems plan stupid (unless you talking bout a mac) I want to see that video and it makes me think of somehting a friend of mine did.

I'll have to ask my friend about it--I don't have that video on my computer..

When I get my hands on it, I'll let you know so I can send it over to you.

... due to overheating. Ahh, the joys of running Quake III with no heatsink on the CPU.. 8) That just seems plan stupid (unless you talking bout a mac) I want to see that video and it makes me think of somehting a friend of mine did.

ZildjianB wrote:Yet another problem with the Mac: One Company = No Competiton = No Lower Prices = Will Never Be Mainstream .

Yet another reason. The underdog. Apple Computer fills that niche market for people who have "seen the light" I guess you could say.

With the Macintosh platform, you have one standard. One company builds the computer. One company builds the OS to work with that hardware. Yet another problem with the Mac: One Company = No Competiton = No Lower Prices = Will ...

... crazy until I used them. In the end I still like PC. Also because Microsoft started out coping macs they become the same. One thing I noticed the Mac copied from PC is the tool bar. That is something I can not live with out and it keep me from even considering mac for a long time. In the end I ...

I think Pent chips are over rated chips. also to give macs creited the run colder than pc and they use few step to run a process (mac 4 steps pent 10 steps) and speed it based on how fast it goes from step to step no how fast it is done That is true. ...

I think Pent chips are over rated chips. also to give macs creited the run colder than pc and they use few step to run a process (mac 4 steps pent 10 steps) and speed it based on how fast it goes from step to step no how fast it is done I agree...pentium's ...

I think Pent chips are over rated chips. also to give macs creited the run colder than pc and they use few step to run a process (mac 4 steps pent 10 steps) and speed it based on how fast it goes from step to step no how fast it is done

Isnt that because mac are not upgrading as fast a PC. Hell a I rember when 1 ghz was top of the line (I got my pc and a 1 ghz whe nthe highest you could get 1.2 ghz) and now I got a lap to that 2ghz Speed Comparison: PowerMac G4 with ...

A Mac will last up to three times as long as a PC and still perform well enough to be considered fast. I've never seen a Mac last three times as long as any of my PCs, but anything is possible (of course, all of my PCs are ...

Isnt that because mac are not upgrading as fast a PC. Hell a I rember when 1 ghz was top of the line (I got my pc and a 1 ghz whe nthe highest you could get 1.2 ghz) and now I got a lap to that 2ghz Speed Comparison: PowerMac G4 with ...

A Mac will last up to three times as long as a PC and still perform well enough to be considered fast. I've never seen a Mac last three times as long as any of my PCs, but anything is possible (of course, all of my PCs are ...

PCs all the way. More power & flexibility for less $$!! A Mac will last up to three times as long as a PC and still perform well enough to be considered fast. More money up front, but less in the long run. Isnt that because mac are not upgrading as ...

ZildjianB wrote:PCs all the way. More power & flexibility for less $$!!

A Mac will last up to three times as long as a PC and still perform well enough to be considered fast.

More money up front, but less in the long run.

Yeah I read about that and I know. The guy in the paper almost makes me sick when ever he goes on and on about Mac and OS X. I want to know more bout PC since that all I ever us. But still you got to say it funny when that happens. Kind of like when Bill Gate was introducing Window 98