Exactly .Plasma2002b wrote:actually i dont think he was supporting it, just stating a fact.
An alternate to AIM+
Moderators: Big-O Ryan, Big-O Mark
- Big-O Mark
- Shortbus Driver
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2002 5:20 pm
- Location: Big-O Software
- Contact:
Re: DEADAIM
-Mark
Big-O Software
Big-O Software
- Master Jedi
- Guru
- Posts: 1161
- Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2002 10:34 pm
- Contact:
Re: An alternate to AIM+
If I were as good a programer as Mark, I'd write one myself, but I'm not so I won't.Mikeini wrote:I am definitly sad to hear that people can be so stupid and threaten you guys if you create a program that is used for no private gain (its free!) .. totally sad. Its ridiculous that someone would even do taht .. argh! So now the question becomes, what can i use as a substitue for aim + .. preferable on teh new aim 5.0 ....
thanks guys.
mike
- whosurdaddy
- Newbie
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:04 pm
- Location: Maryland
- Contact:
I don't think the lack of good FREE programs comes down to a lack of good programmers. I think it comes down to a combination of several things
Ray
- Many good programmers are being paid for their skills and the last thing they want to do after writing code for 10+ hours a day is to come home and work on something for free.
- Releasing a quality program for FREE requires a semblance of generosity. It takes a kind person/group to release something that took a lot of hard work and not expect a dime for it
- The releasing of the product doesn't fit within a good Cost-Benefit Analysis (something I picked up in ECON....lol). Everything we do should be analyzed to see if the cost of the action/activity/product/service (i.e. sanity, money, time, etc) doesn't outweigh the benefits (i.e. warm fuzzies, profit, presitige, etc.). As soon as something becomes more costly than the benefits you receive, it is no longer considered a sound thing to do....economically speaking.
Ray
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 1 guest