Page 1 of 1

TAKES 7 SEC FOR 1 MESSAGE TO SEND!?

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 11:25 am
by Skribblez67
Hi! Thanks for stopping by!

I have a problem with my AIM messenger. When I got to talk to someone, Ill type my message and what not, and when I hit send..it takes about 7-10 seconds for one message to send!
And the only way I can talk regurly like I used to it to connect with someone.
I have also tried uninstalling and reinstalling my aim to maybe try and fix the problem, but its still the same?
Does anyone else have this problem? Do you know how to fix it? Please help me out!

Do you have any advice or help for me?
I apperiate it very much, THANK YOU!

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 11:29 am
by Axilla
skittlebrau!

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 3:45 pm
by Anthony
Stop using dial-up.

Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 5:59 pm
by Moon Child
I'm wondering if it may have something to do with the amount of programs this person is running when online. I would think that could possibly affect it, or maybe the person may have something installed (knowingly/unknowingly) that is using a large amount of memory (unknowingly).

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2004 5:23 pm
by Jrrtt37
Anthony wrote:Stop using dial-up.

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2004 5:38 pm
by Nathan
Jrrtt37 wrote:
Anthony wrote:Stop using dial-up.

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2004 6:21 pm
by Moon Child
First of all, neither of you needed to quote Anth. Stuff like that is why I rarely post on here anymore, along with a few other reasons.

Second, I had a reason for asking that. I have had problems with my im sometimes because of what I said and I don't use dial-up. That's why I posted what I did.

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2004 7:38 pm
by Jrrtt37
First of all, neither of you needed to quote Anth. Stuff like that is why I rarely post on here anymore, along with a few other reasons.
Who Cares.

Second, I had a reason for asking that. I have had problems with my im sometimes because of what I said and I don't use dial-up. That's why I posted what I did.
no, cause when i did use aim i had that problem, and i even thought of that, and it did not solve the problem, has to be on aim side, or connection.

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2004 8:17 pm
by Timelessblur
some time it is cause by computer lag. Another cause is server side. try switching to another screen name and see what happens. Our ddiffen screen name a lot of the time run though diffent AIM servers

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2004 8:28 pm
by Moon Child
Jrrtt37 wrote:[quoteFirst of all, neither of you needed to quote Anth. Stuff like that is why I rarely post on here anymore, along with a few other reasons.

Who Cares.
1) Learn how to quote correctly if you're splitting it up. Just a suggestion.

2) I don't care if you care or not. Posting as the reason to why I post rarely on here was more for those who I consider my friends, which you and Rokbass are NOT on that list.

3) I refuse to respond to anything else you have to say on this topic because you feel the need to act childish over something like a post on a message board. Respond all you want. I do not care. That only serves to prove how childish this board has become.

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2004 8:59 pm
by Nathan
what the hell did i do?

Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2004 9:13 pm
by Jrrtt37
not you, it's me she is talking to. either way, i'll be my childish self and reply to the post, i never knew that i wasn't on your "friend" list, but hey, never was trying to be, i was posting, and i'm sry that i'm to lazy to type the same exact thing at anthony did, darn. you'll get over it. (i'll bet you less than a week that you will forget about it) and i never noticed that you started posting again, but congrats to you on that. :roll: and thanks for the suggestion with the "quoting" i took your advice and edited my much plumed post.

on another note, this bickering is much more interesting than the "why doesn't my history viewer work" topics.

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:34 am
by Nathan
Moon Child wrote:2) ... for those who I consider my friends, which you and Rokbass are NOT on that list.
i was referring to this part and the fact that i was brought into the argument