Big-O Software

btvillarin wrote:Again, it's not our concern to know what the personal attacks were. Just knowing that it was so severe, and we should just offer our sympathy and support. (IMO)

I agree, and retract prior said statements.

It's probably because the attacks were so bad, that it disrupted their lives. Is that worth enduring to provide free software ? Bryan Thank you for understanding! That's exactly what I've been trying to say all along. Mark, I'm not saying I don't understand (see previous posts), I just have trouble...

It's probably because the attacks were so bad, that it disrupted their lives. Is that worth enduring to provide free software ? I don't understand what "attacks" can disrupt their lives. If it is DOS attacks, let the web host deal with that. Hell, even pull down the website or direct peop...

I don't want to sound nosey, but I still can't help but wonder for what reason the software hasn't been released. If someone slandered you that still wouldn't be a reason to postpone a release. The only thing I could see, is a threat, which if physical could be solved by just calling the police. If ...

Mark, if you read this, can't you just give us a little bit more information. Granted, if it's Ryan's decision, then that's cool too, but things just seem to "left in the dark" as they are now. You say something big, bad, and awful happened that makes the decision very easy to make. I have...

Why switch? AIM+ works great with anything up to AIM 5.0. 5.0 sucks anyways. I never upgraded for the sole reason that the benefit of AIM+ is greater than the benefit of AIM 5.0. And all of you who keep being sarcastic pricks, it's time to stop. They've worked hard on this. why don't you all start c...

Granted this may be my very first post on the forum, but I don't think it could come at a more opportune time. Now it may be that people slandering your personal lives is not acceptable, and I agree with that. But must everyone who loves AIM+ suffer because of a few upset and disgruntled people. By ...